Archive for January, 2010

Michael Wolff and Newser.com

“Read less and know more”? Count me in!

The rapid and drastic changes that are molding the face of new media are scaring many people in the biz today. After watching this video interview of Michael Wolff, creator of the site Newser.com, I have to say, my world was rocked. As a journalism student with a new media background, this guy is getting the message out there (a message that is the core of our curriculum here at DePaul) that change is here, and you either swim with it, or you sink.

Wolff has adapted to a changing market, and the strides in technology which now completely change the way we consume news. His site, newser.com, is not the only site to try its hand at aggregation however. A simple internet search will show you a host of aggregator sites like feedreader or even good old Google which is the first site I ever used for such ventures. While some sites do it on a more local level (like WindyCitizen), Wolff has aimed higher.

That the New York Times is no longer the height of journalism, is a claim that Wolff stands by proudly. With so much ‘news’ content being generated by citizens and journalists alike, who’s to say that the New York Times can give you the best perspective on local, or nationwide issues effecting any number of sub-groups or minorities. Sure, it has the budget to tell a hell of a story, but maybe Wolff is right in calling this traditionally top shelf journalism “gassy”. Strides in technology have enabled us to customize our news and find (aggregate) exactly what we want, how we want it. Now thanks to bloggers and local sites more content is available to shed light on different aspects of stories. The New York Times content might be like a one-size fits all moo-moo. A broad view on a big topic. But with news aggregations, we can find any size, perspective, view or attitude that is meaningful to us.

The line that separates news and plain old content (blogs, rants, citizen reporting) is blurry….but even Wolff admits that this snatch and grab trend will lead to a responsibility on the part of aggregators to decide what is newsworthy. While the anchors had a hard time believing that anything newsworthy or legitimate could come from the non-official sources like Bloggers, Wolff’s sneaky tactic of grabbing everything on the web and condensing it into the good, the ‘need to know’ and the hyperlocal creates a bit of a news hot-dog. It tastes delicious and in this case it brings you to a point fast….but what goes into it…well does it really matter?

Rash of muggings hits Chicago’s Northside

http://quikmaps.com/site/128996

Chicago’s Northside has seen a sharp increase in the number of strong armed robberies since last summer, and police are still struggling to find a common link.

The victims, all men in their early 20′s, were all attacked while walking alone. After being confronted by a group of three to four men, all appearing to be in their 20′s, the victims were beaten in the head and face and robbed of their wallets. Two victims were hospitalized as a result. Police are trying to connect these robberies to four previous muggings that took place in the LIncoln Park area in late July and early August. So far, five of the seven robberies have been linked, but no arrests have been made.

FLYP Media and Interactive storytelling

Just browsing through FLYP media, there are many laws of interactive storytelling in play. A dynamic, flash based site like this definitely hits some of the higher points of effective storytelling, but there are immediate and noticeable faults as well.

This site definitely makes a first page promise. The line up of multi media ‘front page’s each feature their own stunning graphics and catchy headlines. This also acts as a great teaser to entice viewers to play the video/flash animation that is each piece.

Another strength of this site is that it seems to be how its tapped into passion groups. Right on the front page there are stories about little known art scene’s in New York. On the other hand, it is really a hinderance that there is way more flash on this site than actual readable, immediate news content. Very much a digital magazine, that requires you to follow its pace and let it take  you to the news in its stories. On sites such as msnbc.com, news is delivered in a more immediate customizable way. Millions of options, news stories and tool bars are available to bring you quickly to what you’re looking for. FLYPMEdia seems to really require time from the viewer, and because the site is so well polished in terms of presentation and look, its demand for your complete attention is not so hard to follow *(unless you’re in a hurry)

A few things that seem to work for the site are:
1) the shelf life of its content. Big stories that don’t change over night. Also a lot of feature-type stories which also dont require updates.
2) The site gives its viewers something to do. Buttons to click, pages to sort through, etc. It doesn’t necessarily stand on its own as a data base, but its stories guide viewers through an interactive magazine, complete with a table of contents.

I did not encounter any raw video on this site, or public involvement in the way of polls or message boards. Comparing this site to hyperlocal news sites that exist, I would say that sites such as WindyCitizen.com and GapersBlock.com do a much better job of presenting a more immediate and citizen angle to stories. With the aid of local blogs and reader generated material routinely posted on the site, a less official version of an event or story seems to come more easily out of these sites. The FLYPMEdia site seems really distanced from its readers. Even their blogs (all three of them) are very generalized and not updated regularly.
There also seems to be no viral component, maps or (unique) big event coverage.

This is definitely not the site to frequent for in-depth, immediate or local news. Despite its beautiful flash video components, this site misses out on some big laws of interactive storytelling.

Essential skills for tomorrow’s journalist

From reading ‘Mashable 8′ and pouring over the blurry list of traits Lavrusik feels tomorrows journalists will need, I find it hard to contradict his view. I think for clarity sake, the list could be shortened to about four things that concisely get to the point.

For one thing, journalists of the future will need to be tech-saavy. Having skills to be able to tell  a story through multiple platforms is essential. From web design, flash animation, video editing, sound recording, camera work and the basics of video format/transfer/authoring, journalists will be pushed further and further into walking the plank and delivering content in the many evolving ways that the general public is beginning to find, use and expect it.

Besides being able to utilize  new technology appropriately and effectively to tell stories and reach audiences, I did agree that to really succeed as a new media journalist, its important to recognize trends and have that business and   entrepreneurial inclination. DePaul’s own Craig Kanalley is a perfect example of this. As a Graduate student, Kanalley combined his keen eye for trends (twitter followings, immediacy of tweets) and his sharp business sense to create BreakingTweets.com. Being an open minded experimenter, Kanalley was able to utilize tweeters around the world as eye witnesses to stories that had an immediate impact on communities and nations all connected by varying technologies.

Journalists now must  be a lot more accessible to their audience. In fact, its part of the job description. Audience engagement is key and journalists now have to build online communities and get their work out to their target audience.

Journalists seem to be stepping out from the shadow of large news organizations and establishing their own credibility as trustworthy professionals. Making their own brand, and standing apart as leaders of thought. This does make me wonder however….how does one do this? This seems to me to be more of an example of a Glenn Beck type character (although not a journalist), he is a brand, and according to Fox News ratings, a leader of thought to millions weekly!

lastly, I think more attention should have been given to the last trait. Basic journalism must-have skills such as information gathering, ethics and writing/reporting are still at the very center of any story no matter the format. A flashy website might have many curious looking stories and interactive lures, but if what you’re reading is not well written or accurate….you may have well been on the Fox News website!
As someone with a strong media background, I find it would be easy for me to slip through the cracks and pursue journalism without seeking out the basic laws and conventions of writing/reporting. I do know how to tell a story visually, and I can write pretty well. But  at the end of the day, i wanted to be able to call myself a journalist and know that even without technology and snazzy enhancements to entice readers, my stories would stand on their own.

Hello world!

More soon!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.